Please vote Christopher Hoyt For State Representative From Rutland-Bennington! :)
Sensible Airbnb Reform
There is a housing crunch, and not a whole lot that
can be done to really help easily ease the crisis, to be
totally honest.
But there are some tweaks to the laws surrounding
Airbnbs that could help a little, while still allowing
people to do it, and make some money off of it. This
could help reduce the housing pressure that comes
from losing single family homes to the airbnb market,
as is often the case, especially in more touristy areas
of the state, where lower income workers have a hard
enough time finding places to buy or to rent.
Currently, airbnbs don’t have to meet the same safety
standards of normal bed and breakfasts, or hotels,
and so sort of have an unfair advantage when it
comes to day-to-day rentals. But they are basically
functioning in the same way as bed and breakfasts,
but without the same safeguards (like exit windows in
case of fire) originally imposed for the good of the
public.
So, long story short, I propose:
Houses/properties that haven’t been brought up to the
safety standards required for normal B&Bs would
have a one week minimum rental period.
For properties that do meet the standards, they could
be rented day to day.
I would propose a one year pause in enforcing the
rule from when it goes in to effect, to give landlords
some time to update their properties, or sell them if
they do not want to comply or to switch to weekly
rentals.
I would also propose an exception for unique
architectural buildings, where--in the opinion of the
average person--implementing required changes
would fundamentally alter the appearance or
desirability of the property (buildings like the hobbit
house here in Middletown Springs, presumably).
I do think towns should have the right to regulate
them further, so that we don’t effectively end up living
next to hotels in what should be strictly residential
areas, protecting the quality of life for existing
residents.
Anyhow, this should help make airbnbs just slightly
less an attractive investment, to keep them from being
snatched up by investors as quickly, and help
maintain additional housing stock for long term
rentals and home ownership. But it would also still
allow people to make money on the side doing it, or to
step up and make the buildings safer and more
accessible for all members of the public. And it would
also help level the playing field for all involved.